It is useful to mention sort in 'descending' order of distance from origin.
Wow, I didn't think this would actually work.
Writing a solution whose size is so close to Leading solution is such a happy thing.
which leading solutions size is always 7 :S
Interesting. If you leave the 'ComparisonMethod','abs' it's still correct (size is 13).
Though, I believe this is the shortest, universally correct solution.
I keep receiving 'Matrix dimensions must agree' when using c(c==-d)... it seems to work fine in matlab, but not on here. Any ideas?
Note that "c(c==-d) = d" means that c and d must be same size or d is scalar. Moreover if d is not a scalar, then all "c==-d" must be true. This code seems to work in rare case, when one value is negative real number, and the rest are positive real numbers, but I have not tested it.
This is like the 'War & Peace' solution. I like it!
where is the problem here? it works on matlab
The function has to be named "complexSort".
Thanks for sharing
i have ran this solution in my MATLAB 2012Ra it's showing the desired result. then , why it is considerd incorrect here?
It looks like the function name has to have a capital S in it.
Simple and elegant, i like it
i keep learning new features...
Return unique values without sorting
Replace Vector Elements
Convert given decimal number to binary number.
Plot Damped Sinusoid
Implement a ROT13 cipher
Reverse Run-Length Encoder
What is the next step in Conway's Life?
Calculate the Levenshtein distance between two strings
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office