Clear Filters
Clear Filters

How to reduce the computation time for adding 3D-array?

1 view (last 30 days)
Hi, I am trying to add multiple 3D-arrays to a bigger 3D-array at a specific index (x,y,z)
Below is the code, and it does work and compute the answer but it seems very ineffecient.
In this example, i only have 4 sets of coordiantes (x,y,z) but in real code, i have more than 1e6 sets of points.
It takes very long to compute the result with that many points.
Is there any way to reduce the computation time?
Thank you in advance
Big=zeros(500,500,500); %%%% Bigger Array
x=[245; 220; 256; 270];
y=[245; 220; 256; 270];
z=[245; 220; 256; 270];
for n = 1 : length(x)
x_end= x_cord + length(Small) -1 ;
y_end= y_cord + length(Small) -1;
z_end=z_cord + length(Small) -1;
if x_end <= length(Big)
Big(x_cord:x_end, y_cord:y_end,z_cord:z_end)=Big(x_cord:x_end, y_cord:y_end,z_cord:z_end)+Small();
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 9 Dec 2020
could also be done with accumarray, but I am not sure that would be faster considering the time to generate the coordinate matrices... though I did just think of a shortcut for that.
jae lee
jae lee on 9 Dec 2020
Hi Walter. Thank you for your comment.
What would be the coordinate matrices??
Does it mean x,y,z?
Thank you

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 24 Dec 2020
Edited: Bruno Luong on 24 Dec 2020
You can reformulate the loop as convolution of
A = accumarray([x(:) y(:) z(:)]-length(Small)/2,1,[500 500 500])
B = flip(flip(flip(Small,1),2),3)
(I left out the detail of overflowed for simplicity)
You might look at convn function. The problem I see is that A is sparse (1/125 in density) and might not be efficient as for loop.
You also might try this FEX to see if you can exploit the sparsity
Or this one using different method of compute convolution
jae lee
jae lee on 7 Jan 2021
I tried the above method but it went into the infinite loop.
A = accumarray([x(:) y(:) z(:)]-length(Small)/2,1,[500 500 500])
B = flip(flip(flip(Small,1),2),3)
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 7 Jan 2021
You might try the alternative convolution implementations in the links I post above.
As I said above, the alternative ways I have proposed might not be fater than your for-loop.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (1)

Amrtanshu Raj
Amrtanshu Raj on 24 Dec 2020
You can use the parfor loop to use parallel processing and get higher computation speeds. However you will have to modify your for loop to be used for parfor loop.
Hope this helps !!


Find more on Images in Help Center and File Exchange




Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!