Narx model GIVES POOR PERFORMANCE
4 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
I am trying to train a NN using NEWNARXSP. When I execute the following commands:
current={ [3.38] [3.37706] [3.37412] [3.37118] [3.36824] [3.3653] [3.36236] [3.35942] [3.35648] [3.35354] [3.3506] [3.34766] [3.34472] [3.34178] [3.33884] [3.3359] [3.33296] [3.33002] [3.32441] [3.32147] [3.32] [3.31804] [3.31706] [3.31559] [3.31412] [3.31118] [3.30922] [3.30771] [3.3053] [3.3] [3.29804] [3.29706] [3.29412] [3.29265] [3.29118] [3.2884] [3.28294] [3.28] [3.27608] [3.27412] [3.27118] [3.26824] [3.267505] [3.26677] [3.26660] [3.26660] [3.26660] [3.2702] [3.27412] [3.27559] [3.27608] [3.27706] [3.27853] [3.28] [3.28147] [3.28294] [3.28588] [3.2898] [3.29559] [3.3] [3.30294] [3.30588] [3.31265] [3.31559] [3.32] [3.3249] [3.32724] [3.33314] [3.33608] [3.34] [3.34294] [3.34735] [3.35078] [3.3547] [3.36] [3.36441] [3.36882] [3.37176] [3.37323] [3.37412] [3.37706] [3.38] [3.38294] [3.38]};
resistance={[6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.04] [6.06] [6.10] [6.12] [6.14] [6.16] [6.18] [6.22] [6.24] [6.28] [6.31] [6.40] [6.44] [6.48] [6.52] [6.56] [6.60] [6.68] [6.78] [6.86] [7] [7.07] [7.23] [7.42] [7.5] [7.58] [7.66] [7.74] [7.9] [8] [8] [8] [7.9] [7.82] [7.74] [7.66] [7.58] [7.5] [7.43] [7.31] [7.16] [7.07] [7] [6.93] [6.83] [6.79] [7.72] [6.65] [6.60] [6.54] [6.5] [6.46] [6.42] [6.38] [6.34] [6.30] [6.26] [6.22] [6.18] [6.15] [6.14] [6.12] [6.11] [6.1] [6.06] [6.02]};
a=cell2mat(current);
b=cell2mat(resistance);
d1=[1 2];
d2=[1 2];
sus=newnarxsp({[3.26660 3.38],[6.02 8]},d1,d2,[5 1],{'tansig','purelin'});
p=[a;b];
T=b;
sus.trainFcn='trainlm';
sus.trainparam.show=100;
sus.trainparam.epochs=1000;
sus=train(sus,p,T);
IT GIVES POOR PERFORMANCE. Actually I want to measure the value of resistance by using the current. here current is input and resistance is target . what can i do now?
1 Comment
Walter Roberson
on 18 Jan 2012
Note: all those [] are unnecessary. Especially as you cell2mat() anyhow, suggesting that you would be better off writing
current = [3.38 3.3776 3,37412 <etc>];
Answers (0)
See Also
Categories
Find more on Deep Learning Toolbox in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!