Can I do a kinematics redundancy by using inverse kinematics?

Are there any ways to do Inverse kinematic and get something like this?
what constrait do I need to add?
I tried to do something like this, but it doesn't well succeed
lbr = importrobot('iiwa14.urdf');
lbr.DataFormat = 'row';
initialguess = lbr.homeConfiguration;
gripper = 'iiwa_link_ee_kuka';
link1 = 'iiwa_link_1';
count = 1;
gik = generalizedInverseKinematics('RigidBodyTree',lbr,'ConstraintInputs',{'pose','orientation','joint'});
poseConst = constraintPoseTarget(gripper);
poseConst.TargetTransform = trvec2tform([0.5 0.5 0.4])*eul2tform([0 0 -pi]);
jointConst = constraintJointBounds(lbr);
maxJointChange = deg2rad(10);
orientationConst = constraintOrientationTarget(link1);
min = -70;
max = 70;
for i = min:10:max
if i == min
jointConst.Weights = zeros(size(jointConst.Weights));
orientationConst.TargetOrientation = eul2quat([deg2rad(i) 0 0]);
qs(count,:) = gik(initialguess,poseConst,orientationConst,jointConst);
initialguess = qs(count,:);
count = count+1;
else
jointConst.Weights = ones(size(jointConst.Weights))*0.25;
jointConst.Bounds = [qs(count-1,:)' - maxJointChange, qs(count-1,:)' + maxJointChange];
orientationConst.TargetOrientation = eul2quat([deg2rad(i) 0 0]);
orientation.Weights = ones(size(orientationConst.Weights))*0.25;
qs(count,:) = gik(initialguess,poseConst,orientationConst,jointConst);
initialguess = qs(count,:);
count = count+1;
end
end
framesPerSecond = 5;
r = rateControl(framesPerSecond);
for i = 1:count-1
show(lbr,qs(i,:),'PreservePlot',false);
% show(lbr,qs(i,:));
drawnow
waitfor(r);
end

Answers (1)

You sould not use orientationTarget for link1.
Try something like below (You only need pose and joint constraints)
lbr = importrobot('iiwa14.urdf');
lbr.DataFormat = 'row';
initialguess = lbr.homeConfiguration;
gripper = 'iiwa_link_ee_kuka';
link1 = 'iiwa_link_1';
count = 1;
gik = generalizedInverseKinematics('RigidBodyTree',lbr,'ConstraintInputs',{'pose','joint'});
poseConst = constraintPoseTarget(gripper);
poseConst.TargetTransform = trvec2tform([0.5 0.5 0.4])*eul2tform([0 0 -pi]);
jointConst = constraintJointBounds(lbr);
maxJointChange = deg2rad(10);
min = -70;
max = 70;
for i = min:5:max
if i == min
qs(count,:) = gik(initialguess,poseConst,jointConst);
initialguess = qs(count,:);
count = count+1;
else
bounds = jointConst.Bounds;
bounds(1,:) = [initialguess(1) + 0.025, bounds(1,2)];
jointConst.Bounds = bounds;
qs(count,:) = gik(initialguess,poseConst,jointConst);
initialguess = qs(count,:);
count = count+1;
end
end
for i = 1:count-1
if i == 1
ax = show(lbr,qs(i,:),'PreservePlot',false);
view(ax, 80, 36);
else
show(lbr,qs(i,:),'PreservePlot',false, 'Parent', ax);
end
drawnow
hold on
end

6 Comments

Thank you for the answer,
I'd like to control the configuration of the robot like the video. but in this code it seem to be random in configuration, do you have any advice for doing something like that
why do you say the configurations seem to be random? the animation should look pretty smooth.
Yes, at first it's smooth but after some point the configuration is change suddenly, back and forth. And the answer (qs) from the code is difference when I rerun it.
I got the same qs when I run the script above, and you can try to visualize that, it should look pretty smooth.
>> qs
qs =
0.4331 0.9973 0.8355 -0.9656 -0.6823 1.4155 -2.0431
0.4581 0.9758 0.7628 -0.9656 -0.6200 1.3964 -2.0684
0.4831 0.9575 0.6943 -0.9656 -0.5620 1.3803 -2.0929
0.5081 0.9416 0.6290 -0.9656 -0.5073 1.3665 -2.1166
0.5331 0.9280 0.5663 -0.9656 -0.4552 1.3547 -2.1398
0.5581 0.9161 0.5056 -0.9656 -0.4052 1.3445 -2.1624
0.5831 0.9059 0.4465 -0.9656 -0.3570 1.3358 -2.1847
0.6081 0.8972 0.3887 -0.9656 -0.3101 1.3285 -2.2066
0.6331 0.8899 0.3321 -0.9656 -0.2644 1.3223 -2.2282
0.6581 0.8838 0.2763 -0.9656 -0.2196 1.3172 -2.2496
0.6831 0.8789 0.2212 -0.9656 -0.1756 1.3131 -2.2707
0.7081 0.8751 0.1667 -0.9656 -0.1322 1.3099 -2.2918
0.7331 0.8724 0.1125 -0.9656 -0.0892 1.3077 -2.3127
0.7581 0.8708 0.0586 -0.9656 -0.0464 1.3063 -2.3335
0.7831 0.8702 0.0048 -0.9656 -0.0038 1.3058 -2.3543
0.8081 0.8706 -0.0489 -0.9656 0.0387 1.3061 -2.3751
0.8331 0.8721 -0.1028 -0.9656 0.0814 1.3074 -2.3959
0.8581 0.8746 -0.1569 -0.9656 0.1244 1.3094 -2.4168
0.8831 0.8782 -0.2113 -0.9656 0.1678 1.3124 -2.4378
0.9081 0.8828 -0.2663 -0.9656 0.2117 1.3164 -2.4590
0.9331 0.8887 -0.3220 -0.9656 0.2563 1.3213 -2.4803
0.9581 0.8958 -0.3785 -0.9656 0.3018 1.3273 -2.5019
0.9831 0.9043 -0.4360 -0.9656 0.3484 1.3344 -2.5237
1.0081 0.9142 -0.4948 -0.9656 0.3964 1.3429 -2.5459
1.0331 0.9257 -0.5552 -0.9656 0.4460 1.3527 -2.5685
1.0581 0.9390 -0.6175 -0.9656 0.4977 1.3642 -2.5916
1.0831 0.9545 -0.6823 -0.9656 0.5519 1.3776 -2.6152
1.1081 0.9723 -0.7502 -0.9656 0.6093 1.3933 -2.6395
1.1331 0.9932 -0.8220 -0.9656 0.6707 1.4118 -2.6647
If you check the solver parameter,
>> gik.SolverParameters
ans =
struct with fields:
MaxIterations: 1500
MaxTime: 10
GradientTolerance: 1.0000e-07
SolutionTolerance: 1.0000e-06
EnforceJointLimits: 1
AllowRandomRestart: 1
StepTolerance: 1.0000e-14
You can see the AllowRandomRestart is turned on by default. You can turn it off - that will guarantee repeatable results, however, in this case, for the given problem, the solver should always be able to comfortably find a solution before it needs to do a random restart.
Which version of MATLAB do you use?
Your qs is running quite smooth like you said.
I use 2020b version. It's really weird that I get different result from you.
I just tested the script in 2020b release and I get exactly the same result shown above. Maybe some internal files in your MATLAB installation got corrupted? I would suggest you start a tech support case regarding this issue.

Sign in to comment.

Categories

Commented:

on 17 Dec 2020

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!