Why R-squares are different between "fitglm" and "fitglme"? or how do "fitglme" and "fitglm" calculate R-squared?
8 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
Hi,
I am using "fitglme" for fitting a mixed-effect logistic regression model.
I could have R-squared from the fitted model.
glme.Rsqaured.Adjusted
Then, I tried to have individual-subject R-squared by using "fitglm" for each subject.
But, the subjectwise-averaged R-squared from "fitglm" was so different from the R-squared of "fitglme".
Why are they so different?
I found that the "fitglm"s R-squared can be derived by the definition of R-squred:
y = glm.Variable.y;
yhat = glm.predict;
ybar = mean(y);
SST = sum((y-ybar).^2);
SSR = sum((yhat-ybar).^2);
R_square = SSR/SST;
R_square_glm = glm.Rsquared.Ordinary;
R_square = R_square_glm;
However, "fitglme"s R-squred is different from the derived R-squared;
y = glme.Variable.y;
yhat = glme.predict;
ybar = mean(y);
SST = sum((y-ybar).^2);
SSR = sum((yhat-ybar).^2);
R_square = SSR/SST;
R_square_glm = glme.Rsquared.Ordinary;
R_square ~= R_square_glm;
How shoud I understand this inconsistency?
I will highly appreciate for you help!
4 Comments
Aditya Patil
on 17 Nov 2020
How different is it? Some small differences might be present due to floating point accuracy. Can you provide complete code to reproduce the issue?
Answers (0)
See Also
Categories
Find more on Industrial Statistics in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!