Why is jordan() much slower than eig()? Both in symbolic forms
8 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
HAOCHENG LUO on 17 Aug 2019
Commented: HAOCHENG LUO on 27 Aug 2019
I have a sparse matrix (attached), and I want to obtain its Jordan canonical form. I used [V,D]=jordan(sym(A)), and found that this matrix is diagonalizable. So I also tried [V,D]=eig(sym(A)), and found eig() is much faster than jordan(). As they are both in symbolic form, I wonder why this happens.
A further question is that, I want to use the obtained decompostion matrices to conduct stablity analysis, which of the following choices is safer? Or, they are all not safe due to numerical problems?
- [V,D]=jordan(sym(A)); V=eval(V); D=eval(D);
- [V,D]=eig(sym(A)); V=eval(V); D=eval(D);
Sourav Bairagya on 20 Aug 2019
Difference between speed of two functions came from the difference between the algorithms used in the implementation of the two functions. Speed also depends on the type of the problem that is being solved.
The difficulty with the Jordan Canonical Form is that it is extremely sensitive to any kind of perturbation or error in data, arithmetic roundoff error or linearization of nonlinear functions. If any of those occurs, then the JCF as well as the Transformation it generates will get changed. Hence, it is always necessary to convert numeric inputs to exact symbolic form before using “jordan” function to compute JCF of a matrix. By converting your data into its exact symbolic form, your data will remain protected from the above-mentioned errors.
For “eig” there is no such issues. But, again for safety, you can convert your data into exact symbolic form before using that function. Hence, it is safer to use 1 and 2 from the choices you have given.
More Answers (0)
Find more on Linear Algebra in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!Start Hunting!