Why is parfor-loop is much slower than for-loop in this case?

4 views (last 30 days)
I just started to explore the pros and cons of parfor-loop. In the simpy testing codes below, parfor-loop is much slower than for-loop. I don't understand why. Any feedbacks are appreciated. (My project is to process a large number of tables and collect the parsing data into a huge long table.)
for loop
(In my 8-core Mac, the elapsed time is in the order of 0.004 seconds.)
C = cell(2,1);
for i = 1:2
A = rand(1,10);
T = array2table(A);
C{i} = T;
Elapsed time is 0.033399 seconds.
(In my 8-core Mac, the elapsed time is in the order of 0.03 seconds.)
D = cell(2,1);
parfor i = 1:2
A = rand(1,10);
T = array2table(A);
D{i} = T;
Starting parallel pool (parpool) using the 'Processes' profile ...
Elapsed time is 18.526561 seconds.

Accepted Answer

Image Analyst
Image Analyst on 25 Mar 2023
There is some setup time required to set up the different CPUs. If you have only 2 iterations and are using such tiny variables like you are, it's usually/mostly not worth it. Try with much larger variables and millions of loop iterations and see if it's better.
Simon on 28 Mar 2023
I tried again using parfor on my original tall table. In this real case, parfor-loop showed its power. All the 8 cores in the machine cranked up. The whole job is finiished less than 600 seconds. Amazing. Thanks for your explanation, which helps me to do it with my real data set.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)


Find more on Parallel for-Loops (parfor) in Help Center and File Exchange




Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!